![]() ![]() I'll pay someone to stand outside my window and play the Calliope before I pay for Amazon premium music just so that they can screw something up that I'm paying extra forĬompletely agree the service is now entirely useless to me. If their angle is to get people to pay for the premium music service I think they're going to be sorely disappointed. And the worst thing is whenever I tell Alexa to play something I have to hear about how generous they were to screw up one of the features that I bought the Alexa for. Now I have to listen to 50,000 songs in between the two songs I like. Sometimes I'm in the mood for an album I used to be able to get like quite a few albums I liked a lot. I like to listen to music before I go to sleep. I would like them to take back their 98 million songs and give me back the 2 million that I could listen to in a way that I wanted to. The sheer gall of them doing this and announcing it as though it's a benefit. It's hard to believe, but there once was a time when all the praise Amazon received was actually legit. Now he's gonna send his little bots out to downvote me and astroturf this thread. It won't happen again, I promise you that. Who'd have thought that guy would turn out to be such a douchenozzle? Not me. Jesus Christ, it was bad enough that I couldn't listen to music on all of my devices unless I bought the "family plan." Family plan? Family plan?! I'm ONE FUCKING PERSON, you jackasses.īye-bye prime. Why would they piss everyone off, and call to their attention just how dangerous it is to become reliant on "music as a service?" Why would they demonstrate how buying Amazon-enabled devices chains a person to Amazon? Forcing them to bend over and take whatever Amazon wants to thrust their way? ![]() Because, damn, why would Amazon do that on purpose? I thought. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |